Epic Games released an ill-fated blog update on Friday featuring explanations for siphoning changes, competitive updates, and more. Pros aren’t happy with the post and expressed their anger on Twitter.

Competitive Fortnite can’t be described as a proper esport yet due to a variety of factors. Lack of consistent events, lack of practice grounds, and an evolving game that present players with little concrete practice for upcoming events (World Cup is being played over the course of three seasons).

Epic Games has tried to solve these issues by throwing money at the problem ($30 million dollars worth of money), but pro players will not sit quietly by as their career is steered wildly around in circles.

Pro Players want their voices heard

Epic Games has been fairly silent about ongoing problems facing competitive Fortnite. Most of these problems have been directly caused by the studio’s adamant stances on keeping up with a rapid update schedule.

Not only does the update schedule of Fortnite hurt the competitive scene, but it has also been reported that Epic Games is mistreating their employees to deliver content.

In response to Epic’s latest update blog post, pro players have erupted in anger and morbid amusement. Epic’s lack of caring for its most passionate players might soon bite back.

Several pros simply tweeted out GIFs as their response as they were so lost for words.

These sum up the feelings we have about the bizarre Epic post exactly. Anger, but with a healthy dose of resigned confusion and defeat.

Liquid’s Chap put the feeling into words when he took to his Twitter. The tweets are fiery, but they speak to a truth that Epic should consider listening too. Even games with massive communities can come crashing down…

While we don’t agree that Fortnite is at the verge of ‘dying’ (a dumb concept of gaming culture to begin with), the premise of Chap’s argument rings true. Epic should listen to its most influential and best players above the wishes of the bottom 10% of players.

Additionally, Epic’s 90% number for people who don’t like the siphoning simply sounds ludicrous. The data is cherry-picked to support Epic’s decision and uses a metric that doesn’t actually tell anything about the quality of gameplay.

Ghost Gaming’s Dmo went ahead and copy-pasted Epic’s own passage from the blog about FOVs. Epic tried to justify the low FOV of 80 as a way to mitigate motion sickness…when players of all skills are reporting motion sickness specifically due to the low FOV.

Overall, as you can see, the reactions aren’t good. Epic Games completely dodged and evaded every hard question throughout the post. If they expected people to be content with the blog, they just aren’t getting it.

Maybe there is a minority of players that simply don’t care about competitive nor the welfare of the gameplay at large…but most players do care.

Most players do want those with motion sickness to have an option of higher FOVs. Most players want competitive Fortnite to thrive whether they play it or not. Most players want siphoning to return because it led to better fights and rewarded the better player.

Tell us your opinions on the blog post in the comments below.

comments below

13 COMMENTS

  1. So funny that the ppl complaining really dont get it. It even gave you a percentage in the post and that 90% is what drives this game. Pros can bitch and whine all they want with their entitled attitudes. Streamers can find new content if their that good. Everyone played just fine for the first 6 seasons when it was gaining popularity. Epic should have never introduced that to core modes. So you 10%, you are in the 10% meaning you are the minority and the author of this piece should be smacked for saying that one part of the community should dictate how the game is played. What a an elities, selfish, dickhead like thing to write. Again, 10%.

  2. Im not a pro player but i want revert too 🙂

    Hate to watch streamers farming 10 min. I dont understand how they not get bored farming.

  3. “Fundamentally, we seek to avoid optional settings which provide players with a significant gameplay advantage.” clueless devs

    what an idiot, having a stretched screen does give an advantage! otherwise no one would of done it!!!!. why is he even lying. anyone who changed their resolution done it to see better and apparently get better aim, therefore making the game unfair. Either everyone or no one should have stretched.

    • Everyone can. In any Pro sport the competitor will use the best equipment they can that is available to them. Do you think an aspiring pro baseball player will use a bamboo bat? If you want to compete in Fortnite, for huge sums of money you will need the best tool for the job and that is a PC. Not hating on console players at all but if you want to go head to head with the best, you need the best device to play it on. Or should we now expect all baseball players to use bamboo bats?

  4. Go play chess if you want consistency. I’m a casual player, even I liked the Syphon thing, but I understand why they reverted it. In fact it makes perfect sense. Give the folks who run this machine successfully for quite some time now a bit of credit. You can’t please everyone.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here